GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Vettori vs Wolvaardt

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
VettoriWinner
87.0

Vettori wins: Longevity

Wolvaardt
86.8

Wolvaardt wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/daniel-vettori-vs-laura-wolvaardt

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇳🇿 Daniel Vettori
87.0

Vettori leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. One of only a handful of players with 300 Test wickets and 4,000 Test runs.

1. Daniel Vettori
87.0
2. Laura Wolvaardt
86.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇿🇦 Laura Wolvaardt5 years played · career day 1,826226 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇳🇿 Daniel Vettori5 years played · career day 2,191106 runs
-53.1% vs Wolvaardt at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇳🇿 Vettori0001048208
🇿🇦 Wolvaardt003272170472

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricVettoriRetiredWolvaardtActive
Test wickets362
Test runs4,531
ODI wickets305
Tests played113
Five-wicket hauls20
World Cup finals reached3
ODI runs4,000
ODI centuries8
ODI average46
Career best ODI ranking2
Dominance w25%8286
Peak w20%9094
Longevity w20%9278
Honours w20%8084
Statistics w15%9494

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Vettori87.0
Wolvaardt86.8
The people
Vettori
Wolvaardt

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Vettori vs Wolvaardt. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →