GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

De Rossi vs Hermoso

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
De RossiWinner
84.1

De Rossi wins: Peak, Longevity

Hermoso
84.1

Hermoso wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Football

Shareable URL · /compare/daniele-de-rossi-vs-jennifer-hermoso

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇮🇹 Daniele De Rossi
84.1

De Rossi leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. World Cup winner in 2006 and Roma's long-serving midfield leader.

1. Daniele De Rossi
84.1
2. Jennifer Hermoso
84.1

Category breakdown

Season form · Goals per season

Career timeline · Goals per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Goals per season
1. 🇮🇹 Daniele De Rossi5 seasons played · career day 1,825331 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇪🇸 Jennifer Hermoso5 seasons played · career day 2,55660 goals
-81.9% vs De Rossi at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇮🇹 De Rossi0055116331685
🇪🇸 Hermoso00001893

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricDe RossiRetiredHermosoActive
World Cup titles11
Italy caps117
Roma appearances616
Coppa Italia titles2
Seasons played19
Champions League titles1
Spain goals57
Liga F titles5
Liga F top-scorer awards3
Dominance w25%7880
Peak w20%8886
Longevity w20%8884
Honours w20%8486
Statistics w15%8486

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
De Rossi84.1
Hermoso84.1
The people
De Rossi
Hermoso

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for De Rossi vs Hermoso. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →