GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Collins vs Azarenka

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CollinsWinner
78.2

Collins wins: Peak, Statistics

Azarenka
78.2

Azarenka wins: Dominance, Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/danielle-collins-vs-victoria-azarenka

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Danielle Collins
78.2

Collins leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Australian Open finalist in 2022 and a two-time NCAA singles champion.

1. Danielle Collins
78.2
2. Victoria Azarenka
78.2

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇺🇸 Danielle Collins5 seasons played · career day 2,19111 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇧🇾 Victoria Azarenka5 seasons played · career day 2,9215 titles
-54.5% vs Collins at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Collins0001622
🇧🇾 Azarenka000018

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricCollinsActiveAzarenkaActive
Grand Slam finals1
WTA titles4
NCAA singles titles2
Career-high ranking7
Career match wins300
Grand Slam titles2
Weeks at No. 151
Career singles titles21
Olympic golds1
WTA 1000 titles10
Dominance w25%7274
Peak w20%9086
Longevity w20%7480
Honours w20%7474
Statistics w15%8478

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Collins78.2
Azarenka78.2
The people
Collins
Azarenka

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Collins vs Azarenka. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →