Who is better, Goyette or Murphy?
Danielle Goyette leads with a GOAT score of 87.8 against 87.8 for Larry Murphy — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Danielle Goyette and Larry Murphy level at 87.8. Danielle Goyette leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Larry Murphy leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Goyette wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Murphy wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/danielle-goyette-vs-larry-murphy
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Goyette leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Goyette | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 316 | 674 |
| 🇨🇦 Murphy | 0 | 0 | 76 | 144 | 276 | 560 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GoyetteRetired | MurphyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic medals | 3 | — |
| World Championship titles | 8 | — |
| International goals | 218 | — |
| Seasons with Canada | 16 | — |
| Stanley Cups | — | 4 |
| Career points | — | 1,216 |
| NHL games played | — | 1,615 |
| Career assists | — | 929 |
| Seasons played | — | 21 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 92 |
Danielle Goyette leads with a GOAT score of 87.8 against 87.8 for Larry Murphy — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Murphy scores higher on statistics, longevity. Goyette leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Goyette: 87.8, Murphy: 87.8.
Make your case for Goyette vs Murphy. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.