Who is better, Goyette or Richard?
Danielle Goyette leads with a GOAT score of 87.8 against 87.7 for Maurice Richard — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Danielle Goyette above Maurice Richard: 87.8 vs 87.7. Danielle Goyette leads on Longevity, Honours, Statistics. Maurice Richard leads on Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Goyette wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Richard wins: Dominance
Shareable URL · /compare/danielle-goyette-vs-maurice-richard
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Goyette leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Goyette | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 316 | 674 |
| 🇨🇦 Richard | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 154 | 287 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GoyetteRetired | RichardRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic medals | 3 | — |
| World Championship titles | 8 | — |
| International goals | 218 | — |
| Seasons with Canada | 16 | — |
| Stanley Cups | — | 8 |
| Hart Trophies | — | 1 |
| NHL goals | — | 544 |
| All-Star selections | — | 14 |
| Playoff goals | — | 82 |
| 50-goal seasons | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Danielle Goyette leads with a GOAT score of 87.8 against 87.7 for Maurice Richard — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Richard scores higher on dominance. Goyette leads on honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Goyette: 87.8, Richard: 87.7.
Make your case for Goyette vs Richard. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.