Who is better, Scott-Arruda or Simón?
Robertlandy Simón leads with a GOAT score of 83.5 against 83.4 for Danielle Scott-Arruda — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Robertlandy Simón above Danielle Scott-Arruda: 83.5 vs 83.4. Robertlandy Simón leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Danielle Scott-Arruda leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Simón wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Scott-Arruda wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/danielle-scott-arruda-vs-robertlandy-simon
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Simón leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Scott-Arruda | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 328 | 676 |
| 🇨🇺 Simón | 0 | 0 | 55 | 121 | 371 | 739 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Scott-ArrudaRetired | SimónActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 5 | — |
| World Grand Prix medals | 4 | — |
| NORCECA titles | 3 | — |
| Years with the national team | 19 | — |
| World League medals | — | 2 |
| World League MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Champions League titles | — | 3 |
| Club World Championship titles | — | 2 |
| Years at the top level | — | 20 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 82 |
Robertlandy Simón leads with a GOAT score of 83.5 against 83.4 for Danielle Scott-Arruda — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Scott-Arruda scores higher on longevity. Simón leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Scott-Arruda: 83.4, Simón: 83.5.
Make your case for Scott-Arruda vs Simón. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.