Who is better, Scott-Arruda or Faure?
Danielle Scott-Arruda leads with a GOAT score of 83.4 against 83.4 for Théo Faure — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Danielle Scott-Arruda and Théo Faure level at 83.4. Danielle Scott-Arruda leads on Longevity. Théo Faure leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Scott-Arruda wins: Longevity
Faure wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/danielle-scott-arruda-vs-theo-faure-bv
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Scott-Arruda leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Scott-Arruda | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 328 | 676 |
| 🇫🇷 Faure | 0 | 0 | 55 | 116 | 254 | 689 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Scott-ArrudaRetired | FaureActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 5 | — |
| World Grand Prix medals | 4 | — |
| NORCECA titles | 3 | — |
| Years with the national team | 19 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| Nations League medals | — | 2 |
| French league titles | — | 1 |
| National team caps | — | 90 |
| Club European appearances | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 84 |
Danielle Scott-Arruda leads with a GOAT score of 83.4 against 83.4 for Théo Faure — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Faure scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Scott-Arruda leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Scott-Arruda: 83.4, Faure: 83.4.
Make your case for Scott-Arruda vs Faure. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.