Who is better, Medvedev or Świątek?
Daniil Medvedev leads with a GOAT score of 85.7 against 83.8 for Iga Świątek — a gap of 1.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Medvedev vs Świątek
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Daniil Medvedev above Iga Świątek: 85.7 vs 83.8. Daniil Medvedev leads on Longevity, Peak. Iga Świątek leads on Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MedvedevWinner
85.7Medvedev wins: Peak, Longevity
Świątek
83.8Świątek wins: Dominance
Candidates
Locked to TennisShareable URL · /compare/daniil-medvedev-vs-iga-swiatek
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇷🇺 Daniil Medvedev
85.7
Medvedev leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Daniil Medvedev
2. Iga Świątek
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇵🇱 Iga Świątek5 seasons played · career day 2,92117 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇷🇺 Daniil Medvedev5 seasons played · career day 2,92115 titles
-11.8% vs Świątek at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 Medvedev | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 17 |
| 🇵🇱 Świątek | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Medvedev85.7
Świątek83.8
FAQ
Where does Świątek beat Medvedev?
Świątek scores higher on dominance. Medvedev leads on peak, longevity.
How is the Medvedev vs Świątek score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Medvedev: 85.7, Świątek: 83.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Medvedev vs Świątek. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.