Who is better, Medvedev or Pietrangeli?
Daniil Medvedev leads with a GOAT score of 85.7 against 85.5 for Nicola Pietrangeli — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Daniil Medvedev above Nicola Pietrangeli: 85.7 vs 85.5. Daniil Medvedev leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Nicola Pietrangeli leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Medvedev wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Pietrangeli wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/daniil-medvedev-vs-nicola-pietrangeli
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Medvedev leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 Medvedev | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 17 |
| 🇮🇹 Pietrangeli | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 29 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MedvedevActive | PietrangeliRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 1 | 2 |
| ATP titles | 20 | — |
| Weeks at No. 1 | 16 | — |
| ATP Finals titles | 1 | — |
| Masters titles | 6 | — |
| Grand Slam doubles titles | — | 1 |
| Davis Cup matches | — | 164 |
| Davis Cup wins | — | 120 |
| Career titles | — | 48 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 90 |
Daniil Medvedev leads with a GOAT score of 85.7 against 85.5 for Nicola Pietrangeli — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Pietrangeli scores higher on longevity. Medvedev leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Medvedev: 85.7, Pietrangeli: 85.5.
Make your case for Medvedev vs Pietrangeli. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.