AthletesTeams
Medvedev vs Zvonareva
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MedvedevWinner
85.7Medvedev wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Zvonareva
84.3Zvonareva wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to TennisShareable URL · /compare/daniil-medvedev-vs-vera-zvonareva
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇷🇺 Daniil Medvedev
85.7
Medvedev leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Daniil Medvedev
2. Vera Zvonareva
Category breakdown
Season form · Titles per season
Career timeline · Titles per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Titles per season1. 🇷🇺 Vera Zvonareva5 seasons played · career day 2,556118 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇷🇺 Daniil Medvedev5 seasons played · career day 2,92115 titles
-87.3% vs Zvonareva at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 Medvedev | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 17 |
| 🇷🇺 Zvonareva | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 72 | 161 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MedvedevActive | ZvonarevaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 1 | — |
| ATP titles | 20 | — |
| Weeks at No. 1 | 16 | — |
| ATP Finals titles | 1 | — |
| Masters titles | 6 | — |
| Grand Slam finals | — | 2 |
| Grand Slam doubles titles | — | 3 |
| WTA singles titles | — | 12 |
| Career high ranking | — | 2 |
| Olympic medals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 88 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Medvedev85.7
Zvonareva84.3
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Medvedev vs Zvonareva. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.