Who is better, García or Baer?
Danny García leads with a GOAT score of 83.6 against 83.6 for Max Baer — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
García vs Baer
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Danny García and Max Baer level at 83.6. Danny García leads on Longevity. Max Baer leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GarcíaWinner
83.6García wins: Longevity
Baer
83.6Baer wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/danny-garcia-vs-max-baer
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Danny García
83.6
García leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Danny García
2. Max Baer
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Max Baer5 years played · career day 1,825329 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Danny García5 years played · career day 1,82521 title wins
-93.6% vs Baer at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 García | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 21 | 30 |
| 🇺🇸 Baer | 0 | 0 | 45 | 100 | 329 | 659 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
García83.6
Baer83.6
FAQ
Where does Baer beat García?
Baer scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. García leads on longevity.
How is the García vs Baer score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. García: 83.6, Baer: 83.6.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for García vs Baer. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.