Who is better, Amaral or Fábio Luiz?
Fábio Luiz Magalhães leads with a GOAT score of 89.2 against 88.9 for Dante Amaral — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Fábio Luiz Magalhães above Dante Amaral: 89.2 vs 88.9. Fábio Luiz Magalhães leads on Dominance, Peak. Dante Amaral leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fábio Luiz wins: Dominance, Peak
Amaral wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/dante-amaral-vs-fabio-luiz-bv
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fábio Luiz leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Amaral | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 62 |
| 🇧🇷 Fábio Luiz | 0 | 0 | 55 | 114 | 317 | 646 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AmaralRetired | Fábio LuizRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| World Championship golds | 2 | — |
| World League titles | 6 | — |
| World Cup titles | 2 | — |
| Olympic Games | 3 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| World Tour titles | — | 14 |
| World Tour Finals medals | — | 3 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 88 |
Fábio Luiz Magalhães leads with a GOAT score of 89.2 against 88.9 for Dante Amaral — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Amaral scores higher on statistics, longevity. Fábio Luiz leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Amaral: 88.9, Fábio Luiz: 89.2.
Make your case for Amaral vs Fábio Luiz. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.