Who is better, Boninfante or Poulter?
Dante Boninfante leads with a GOAT score of 78.6 against 78.3 for Jordyn Poulter — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Dante Boninfante above Jordyn Poulter: 78.6 vs 78.3. Dante Boninfante leads on Longevity. Jordyn Poulter leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Boninfante wins: Longevity
Poulter wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/dante-boninfante-vs-jordyn-poulter
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Boninfante leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Boninfante | 0 | 0 | 48 | 104 | 308 | 638 |
| 🇺🇸 Poulter | 0 | 0 | 58 | 130 | 398 | 650 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BoninfanteRetired | PoulterActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | 2 |
| World League medals | 2 | — |
| Italian league titles | 1 | — |
| European club medals | 2 | — |
| Years at the top level | 19 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| Nations League titles | — | 2 |
| Best setter awards | — | 2 |
| Years with the national team | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 78 |
Dante Boninfante leads with a GOAT score of 78.6 against 78.3 for Jordyn Poulter — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Poulter scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Boninfante leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Boninfante: 78.6, Poulter: 78.3.
Make your case for Boninfante vs Poulter. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.