Who is better, Boninfante or Tetyukhin?
Sergey Tetyukhin leads with a GOAT score of 78.7 against 78.6 for Dante Boninfante — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sergey Tetyukhin above Dante Boninfante: 78.7 vs 78.6. Sergey Tetyukhin leads on Longevity. Dante Boninfante leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Tetyukhin wins: Longevity
Boninfante wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/dante-boninfante-vs-tetyukhin
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Tetyukhin leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Boninfante | 0 | 0 | 48 | 104 | 308 | 638 |
| 🇷🇺 Tetyukhin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 28 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BoninfanteRetired | TetyukhinRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | 4 |
| World League medals | 2 | — |
| Italian league titles | 1 | — |
| European club medals | 2 | — |
| Years at the top level | 19 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| European Championship titles | — | 2 |
| World League titles | — | 3 |
| Russian league titles | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 74 |
Sergey Tetyukhin leads with a GOAT score of 78.7 against 78.6 for Dante Boninfante — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Boninfante scores higher on peak, statistics. Tetyukhin leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Boninfante: 78.6, Tetyukhin: 78.7.
Make your case for Boninfante vs Tetyukhin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.