Who is better, Kasatkina or Tanner?
Daria Kasatkina leads with a GOAT score of 79.0 against 79.0 for Roscoe Tanner — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Kasatkina vs Tanner
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Daria Kasatkina and Roscoe Tanner level at 79.0. Daria Kasatkina leads on Longevity. Roscoe Tanner leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
KasatkinaWinner
79.0Kasatkina wins: Longevity
Tanner
79.0Tanner wins: Peak
Candidates
Locked to TennisShareable URL · /compare/daria-kasatkina-vs-roscoe-tanner
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Daria Kasatkina
79.0
Kasatkina leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Daria Kasatkina
2. Roscoe Tanner
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇦🇺 Daria Kasatkina5 seasons played · career day 2,19012 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Roscoe Tanner5 seasons played · career day 2,55610 titles
-16.7% vs Kasatkina at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Kasatkina | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 22 |
| 🇺🇸 Tanner | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 15 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Kasatkina79.0
Tanner79.0
FAQ
Where does Tanner beat Kasatkina?
Tanner scores higher on peak. Kasatkina leads on longevity.
How is the Kasatkina vs Tanner score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kasatkina: 79.0, Tanner: 79.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Kasatkina vs Tanner. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.