Who is better, Casper or Mills?
Dave Casper leads with a GOAT score of 85.2 against 85.2 for Sam Mills — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Casper vs Mills
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Dave Casper and Sam Mills level at 85.2. Dave Casper leads on Honours. Sam Mills leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CasperWinner
85.2Casper wins: Honours
Mills
85.2Mills wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to American FootballShareable URL · /compare/dave-casper-vs-sam-mills
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Dave Casper
85.2
Casper leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Dave Casper
2. Sam Mills
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Dave Casper5 seasons played · career day 1,825325 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Sam Mills5 seasons played · career day 1,825313 touchdowns
-3.7% vs Casper at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Casper | 0 | 0 | 45 | 100 | 325 | 633 |
| 🇺🇸 Mills | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 313 | 658 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Casper85.2
Mills85.2
FAQ
Where does Mills beat Casper?
Mills scores higher on longevity. Casper leads on honours.
How is the Casper vs Mills score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Casper: 85.2, Mills: 85.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Casper vs Mills. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.