Who is better, Winfield or Stearnes?
Dave Winfield leads with a GOAT score of 89.9 against 89.8 for Turkey Stearnes — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Dave Winfield above Turkey Stearnes: 89.9 vs 89.8. Dave Winfield leads on Longevity, Honours. Turkey Stearnes leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Winfield wins: Longevity, Honours
Stearnes wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/dave-winfield-vs-turkey-stearnes
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Winfield leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Winfield | 0 | 0 | 3 | 23 | 76 | 167 |
| 🇺🇸 Stearnes | 0 | 0 | 0.362 | 0.727 | 1.832 | 3.259 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WinfieldRetired | StearnesRetired |
|---|---|---|
| All-Star selections | 12 | — |
| Gold Gloves | 7 | — |
| Career hits | 3,110 | — |
| Career home runs | 465 | — |
| World Series titles | 1 | — |
| Negro League home run titles | — | 7 |
| Career batting average | — | 0.348 |
| Negro League All-Star selections | — | 5 |
| Seasons played | — | 20 |
| Hall of Fame inductions | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 94 |
Dave Winfield leads with a GOAT score of 89.9 against 89.8 for Turkey Stearnes — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Stearnes scores higher on peak, dominance. Winfield leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Winfield: 89.9, Stearnes: 89.8.
Make your case for Winfield vs Stearnes. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.