GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Gower vs McGrath

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GowerWinner
87.4

Gower wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics

McGrath
87.3

McGrath wins: Dominance, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/david-gower-vs-glenn-mcgrath

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 David Gower
87.4

Gower leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Elegant left-hander who led England to the 1985 Ashes with 732 runs.

1. David Gower
87.4
2. Glenn McGrath
87.3

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇦🇺 Glenn McGrath5 years played · career day 2,556238 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 David Gower5 years played · career day 2,921236 runs
-0.8% vs McGrath at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Gower000076298
🇦🇺 McGrath000072338

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricGowerRetiredMcGrathRetired
Test runs8,231
Test centuries18
Ashes series won as captain1
Runs in the 1985 Ashes732
Tests played117
Test wickets563
ODI wickets381
World Cups3
Five-wicket hauls29
Test bowling average21.64
World Cup wickets71
Dominance w25%8286
Peak w20%9490
Longevity w20%8884
Honours w20%8286
Statistics w15%9492

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Gower87.4
McGrath87.3
The people
Gower
McGrath

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Gower vs McGrath. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →