Who is better, Haye or Flowers?
Tiger Flowers leads with a GOAT score of 82.9 against 82.8 for David Haye — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Haye vs Flowers
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Tiger Flowers above David Haye: 82.9 vs 82.8. Tiger Flowers leads on Dominance, Statistics. David Haye leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FlowersWinner
82.9Flowers wins: Dominance, Statistics
Haye
82.8Haye wins: Longevity, Honours
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/david-haye-vs-tiger-flowers
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Tiger Flowers
82.9
Flowers leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Tiger Flowers
2. David Haye
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Tiger Flowers5 years played · career day 1,825280 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 David Haye5 years played · career day 1,82517 title wins
-93.9% vs Flowers at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Haye | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 17 | 25 |
| 🇺🇸 Flowers | 0 | 0 | 40 | 88 | 280 | 607 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Flowers82.9
Haye82.8
FAQ
Where does Haye beat Flowers?
Haye scores higher on honours, longevity. Flowers leads on dominance, statistics.
How is the Haye vs Flowers score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Haye: 82.8, Flowers: 82.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Haye vs Flowers. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.