Who is better, Popovici or Borodin?
Ilya Borodin leads with a GOAT score of 71.7 against 70.4 for David Popovici — a gap of 1.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ilya Borodin above David Popovici: 71.7 vs 70.4. Ilya Borodin leads on Longevity, Honours. David Popovici leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Borodin wins: Longevity, Honours
Popovici wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/david-popovici-vs-ilya-borodin
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Borodin leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇴 Popovici | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 141.92 | 281.7 |
| 🇷🇺 Borodin | 0 | 0 | 62 | 140 | 392 | 538 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | PopoviciActive | BorodinActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| World titles | 2 | — |
| European titles | 6 | 1 |
| World records | 1 | — |
| Personal best 100 m free (s) | 46.4 | — |
| European junior titles | — | 3 |
| Personal best 400 IM (min) | — | 4.095 |
| National titles | — | 4 |
| World junior records | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 68 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 46 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 70 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 74 |
Ilya Borodin leads with a GOAT score of 71.7 against 70.4 for David Popovici — a gap of 1.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Popovici scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Borodin leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Popovici: 70.4, Borodin: 71.7.
Make your case for Popovici vs Borodin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.