Who is better, Robinson or Dehnert?
Dutch Dehnert leads with a GOAT score of 86.7 against 86.5 for David Robinson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Dutch Dehnert above David Robinson: 86.7 vs 86.5. Dutch Dehnert leads on Longevity, Peak. David Robinson leads on Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Dehnert wins: Peak, Longevity
Robinson wins: Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/david-robinson-vs-dutch-dehnert
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Dehnert leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Robinson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 73.1 | 178.9 |
| 🇺🇸 Dehnert | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 44 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RobinsonRetired | DehnertRetired |
|---|---|---|
| MVP awards | 1 | — |
| NBA titles | 2 | — |
| Defensive Player of the Year | 1 | — |
| Scoring titles | 1 | — |
| All-Star selections | 10 | — |
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| Championships | — | 5 |
| Seasons played | — | 22 |
| Career games | — | 1,500 |
| Hall of Fame inductions | — | 1 |
| Original Celtics seasons | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 86 |
Dutch Dehnert leads with a GOAT score of 86.7 against 86.5 for David Robinson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Robinson scores higher on honours, statistics. Dehnert leads on peak, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Robinson: 86.5, Dehnert: 86.7.
Make your case for Robinson vs Dehnert. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.