Who is better, Robinson or Crawford?
Joan Crawford leads with a GOAT score of 86.7 against 86.5 for David Robinson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Joan Crawford above David Robinson: 86.7 vs 86.5. Joan Crawford leads on Longevity, Honours. David Robinson leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Crawford wins: Longevity, Honours
Robinson wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/david-robinson-vs-joan-crawford-basketball
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Crawford leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Robinson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 73.1 | 178.9 |
| 🇺🇸 Crawford | 0 | 0 | 55 | 116 | 254 | 689 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RobinsonRetired | CrawfordRetired |
|---|---|---|
| MVP awards | 1 | — |
| NBA titles | 2 | — |
| Defensive Player of the Year | 1 | — |
| Scoring titles | 1 | — |
| All-Star selections | 10 | — |
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| AAU All-American selections | — | 11 |
| AAU national titles | — | 8 |
| World Championship gold medals | — | 1 |
| Pan American gold medals | — | 1 |
| Seasons at national level | — | 16 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 86 |
Joan Crawford leads with a GOAT score of 86.7 against 86.5 for David Robinson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Robinson scores higher on statistics. Crawford leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Robinson: 86.5, Crawford: 86.7.
Make your case for Robinson vs Crawford. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.