Who is better, Robinson or McClain?
David Robinson leads with a GOAT score of 86.5 against 86.5 for Katrina McClain — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores David Robinson and Katrina McClain level at 86.5. David Robinson leads on Longevity. Katrina McClain leads on Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Robinson wins: Longevity
McClain wins: Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/david-robinson-vs-katrina-mcclain
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Robinson leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Robinson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 73.1 | 178.9 |
| 🇺🇸 McClain | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 342 | 676 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RobinsonRetired | McClainRetired |
|---|---|---|
| MVP awards | 1 | — |
| NBA titles | 2 | — |
| Defensive Player of the Year | 1 | — |
| Scoring titles | 1 | — |
| All-Star selections | 10 | — |
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 2 |
| World Championship titles | — | 2 |
| Olympic medals | — | 3 |
| USA Basketball Player of the Year awards | — | 3 |
| Rebounds per game at 1996 Games | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 90 |
David Robinson leads with a GOAT score of 86.5 against 86.5 for Katrina McClain — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
McClain scores higher on peak, honours. Robinson leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Robinson: 86.5, McClain: 86.5.
Make your case for Robinson vs McClain. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.