Who is better, Thompson or Wallace?
Rasheed Wallace leads with a GOAT score of 79.1 against 78.9 for David Thompson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Rasheed Wallace above David Thompson: 79.1 vs 78.9. Rasheed Wallace leads on Longevity. David Thompson leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Wallace wins: Longevity
Thompson wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/david-thompson-vs-rasheed-wallace
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Wallace leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Thompson | 0 | 0 | 26 | 51.9 | 124.6 | 190.2 |
| 🇺🇸 Wallace | 0 | 0 | 10.1 | 22.9 | 68.5 | 140.4 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Rasheed Wallace leads with a GOAT score of 79.1 against 78.9 for David Thompson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Thompson scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Wallace leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Thompson: 78.9, Wallace: 79.1.
Make your case for Thompson vs Wallace. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.