Who is better, Thompson or Kemp?
Shawn Kemp leads with a GOAT score of 79.0 against 78.9 for David Thompson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Shawn Kemp above David Thompson: 79.0 vs 78.9. Shawn Kemp leads on Longevity. David Thompson leads on Peak, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kemp wins: Longevity
Thompson wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/david-thompson-vs-shawn-kemp
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kemp leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Thompson | 0 | 0 | 26 | 51.9 | 124.6 | 190.2 |
| 🇺🇸 Kemp | 0 | 0 | 6.5 | 20.3 | 71.7 | 146.7 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ThompsonRetired | KempRetired |
|---|---|---|
| All-Star selections | 5 | — |
| Single-game points | 73 | — |
| All-Star Game MVP awards | 2 | — |
| NCAA titles | 1 | — |
| Points per game peak | 27.2 | — |
| NBA All-Star selections | — | 6 |
| All-NBA selections | — | 3 |
| Career points | — | 15,347 |
| Career rebounds | — | 8,834 |
| NBA Finals appearances | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 60 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 82 |
Shawn Kemp leads with a GOAT score of 79.0 against 78.9 for David Thompson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Thompson scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Kemp leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Thompson: 78.9, Kemp: 79.0.
Make your case for Thompson vs Kemp. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.