Who is better, Trezeguet or Lineker?
David Trezeguet leads with a GOAT score of 83.9 against 83.9 for Gary Lineker — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores David Trezeguet and Gary Lineker level at 83.9. David Trezeguet leads on Longevity, Honours. Gary Lineker leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Trezeguet wins: Longevity, Honours
Lineker wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/david-trezeguet-vs-gary-lineker
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Trezeguet leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷 Trezeguet | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 125 |
| 🏴 Lineker | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 310 | 662 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | TrezeguetRetired | LinekerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| European Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Serie A titles | 2 | — |
| Serie A goals | 138 | — |
| France goals | 34 | — |
| World Cup Golden Boot awards | — | 1 |
| England goals | — | 48 |
| Career league goals | — | 282 |
| Cup Winners' Cup titles | — | 1 |
| English top-scorer awards | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 90 |
David Trezeguet leads with a GOAT score of 83.9 against 83.9 for Gary Lineker — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Lineker scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Trezeguet leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Trezeguet: 83.9, Lineker: 83.9.
Make your case for Trezeguet vs Lineker. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.