Who is better, Trezeguet or Hamraoui?
Kheira Hamraoui leads with a GOAT score of 84.0 against 83.9 for David Trezeguet — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Kheira Hamraoui above David Trezeguet: 84.0 vs 83.9. Kheira Hamraoui leads on Dominance, Honours. David Trezeguet leads on Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hamraoui wins: Dominance, Honours
Trezeguet wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/david-trezeguet-vs-kheira-hamraoui-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hamraoui leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷 Trezeguet | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 125 |
| 🇫🇷 Hamraoui | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 287 | 584 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | TrezeguetRetired | HamraouiActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| European Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Serie A titles | 2 | — |
| Serie A goals | 138 | — |
| France goals | 34 | — |
| Champions League titles | — | 1 |
| Liga F titles | — | 1 |
| French league titles | — | 2 |
| France caps | — | 40 |
| French cups | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 87 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 84 |
Kheira Hamraoui leads with a GOAT score of 84.0 against 83.9 for David Trezeguet — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Trezeguet scores higher on peak, statistics. Hamraoui leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Trezeguet: 83.9, Hamraoui: 84.0.
Make your case for Trezeguet vs Hamraoui. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.