Who is better, Trezeguet or Scholes?
David Trezeguet leads with a GOAT score of 83.9 against 83.9 for Paul Scholes — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores David Trezeguet and Paul Scholes level at 83.9. David Trezeguet leads on Statistics, Peak. Paul Scholes leads on Longevity, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Trezeguet wins: Peak, Statistics
Scholes wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/david-trezeguet-vs-paul-scholes
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Trezeguet leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷 Trezeguet | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 125 |
| 🏴 Scholes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 45 | 84 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | TrezeguetRetired | ScholesRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| European Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Serie A titles | 2 | — |
| Serie A goals | 138 | — |
| France goals | 34 | — |
| Premier League titles | — | 11 |
| Champions League titles | — | 2 |
| Career goals | — | 155 |
| Appearances | — | 718 |
| FA Cups | — | 3 |
| England caps | — | 66 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 82 |
David Trezeguet leads with a GOAT score of 83.9 against 83.9 for Paul Scholes — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Scholes scores higher on dominance, honours, longevity. Trezeguet leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Trezeguet: 83.9, Scholes: 83.9.
Make your case for Trezeguet vs Scholes. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.