GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Šuker vs Blackstenius

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BlacksteniusWinner
79.9

Blackstenius wins: Longevity, Honours

Šuker
79.8

Šuker wins: Peak, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Football

Shareable URL · /compare/davor-suker-vs-stina-blackstenius

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇸🇪 Stina Blackstenius
79.9

Blackstenius leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Scored the winning goal in the 2025 Champions League final for Arsenal.

1. Stina Blackstenius
79.9
2. Davor Šuker
79.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Goals per season

Career timeline · Goals per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Goals per season
1. 🇭🇷 Davor Šuker5 seasons played · career day 1,82572 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Stina Blackstenius5 seasons played · career day 1,82553 goals
-26.4% vs Šuker at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇭🇷 Šuker0082272140
🇸🇪 Blackstenius006175394

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricŠukerRetiredBlacksteniusActive
World Cup Golden Boot1
Croatia goals45
Croatia caps69
Champions League titles11
La Liga titles1
Olympic silver medals2
Sweden goals45
Sweden caps115
World Cup bronze medals2
Dominance w25%7878
Peak w20%8886
Longevity w20%7476
Honours w20%7880
Statistics w15%8280

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Blackstenius79.9
Šuker79.8
The people
Šuker
Blackstenius

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Šuker vs Blackstenius. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →