Who is better, Fraser or Adlington?
Rebecca Adlington leads with a GOAT score of 87.0 against 86.8 for Dawn Fraser — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Rebecca Adlington above Dawn Fraser: 87.0 vs 86.8. Rebecca Adlington leads on Peak, Statistics. Dawn Fraser leads on Dominance, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Adlington wins: Peak, Statistics
Fraser wins: Dominance, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/dawn-fraser-vs-rebecca-adlington
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Adlington leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Fraser | 0 | 0 | 0 | 62 | 244.3 | 481.7 |
| 🏴 Adlington | 0 | 0 | 45 | 103 | 260 | 644 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FraserRetired | AdlingtonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 4 | — |
| Olympic medals | 8 | 4 |
| World records | 39 | — |
| Consecutive Olympic titles | 3 | — |
| Commonwealth golds | 6 | — |
| 100 m freestyle best (s) | 58.9 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 2 |
| World records set | — | 1 |
| World Championship titles | — | 1 |
| Commonwealth titles | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 90 |
Rebecca Adlington leads with a GOAT score of 87.0 against 86.8 for Dawn Fraser — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Fraser scores higher on dominance, longevity. Adlington leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Fraser: 86.8, Adlington: 87.0.
Make your case for Fraser vs Adlington. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.