Who is better, De Bruyne or Fitschen?
Kevin De Bruyne leads with a GOAT score of 85.7 against 85.7 for Doris Fitschen — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Kevin De Bruyne and Doris Fitschen level at 85.7. Kevin De Bruyne leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak. Doris Fitschen leads on Honours, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →De Bruyne wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Fitschen wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/de-bruyne-vs-doris-fitschen-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
De Bruyne leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇪 De Bruyne | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 |
| 🇩🇪 Fitschen | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 293 | 605 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | De BruyneActive · SSC Napoli | FitschenRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Premier League titles | 6 | — |
| Champions League titles | 1 | — |
| Premier League assists | 119 | — |
| PFA Player of the Year | 2 | — |
| Career goals | 160 | — |
| Belgium caps | 110 | — |
| European Championship titles | — | 4 |
| Germany caps | — | 144 |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| Bundesliga titles | — | 2 |
| World Cup appearances | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 89 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 84 |
Kevin De Bruyne leads with a GOAT score of 85.7 against 85.7 for Doris Fitschen — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Fitschen scores higher on honours, longevity. De Bruyne leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. De Bruyne: 85.7, Fitschen: 85.7.
Make your case for De Bruyne vs Fitschen. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.