Who is better, De Bruyne or Sjögran?
Therese Sjögran leads with a GOAT score of 85.8 against 85.7 for Kevin De Bruyne — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Therese Sjögran above Kevin De Bruyne: 85.8 vs 85.7. Therese Sjögran leads on Longevity. Kevin De Bruyne leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Sjögran wins: Longevity
De Bruyne wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/de-bruyne-vs-therese-sjogran-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Sjögran leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇪 De Bruyne | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 |
| 🇸🇪 Sjögran | 0 | 0 | 52 | 108 | 300 | 612 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | De BruyneActive · SSC Napoli | SjögranRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Premier League titles | 6 | — |
| Champions League titles | 1 | — |
| Premier League assists | 119 | — |
| PFA Player of the Year | 2 | — |
| Career goals | 160 | — |
| Belgium caps | 110 | — |
| Sweden caps | — | 214 |
| Sweden goals | — | 26 |
| Damallsvenskan titles | — | 5 |
| World Cup finals | — | 1 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 86 |
Therese Sjögran leads with a GOAT score of 85.8 against 85.7 for Kevin De Bruyne — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
De Bruyne scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Sjögran leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. De Bruyne: 85.7, Sjögran: 85.8.
Make your case for De Bruyne vs Sjögran. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.