Who is better, Jones or Manning?
Peyton Manning leads with a GOAT score of 90.7 against 90.4 for Deacon Jones — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Peyton Manning above Deacon Jones: 90.7 vs 90.4. Peyton Manning leads on Longevity, Honours, Statistics. Deacon Jones leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Manning wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Jones wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/deacon-jones-vs-peyton-manning
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Manning leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Jones | 0 | 0 | 5 | 13 | 68 | 151 |
| 🇺🇸 Manning | 0 | 0 | 26 | 52 | 138 | 275 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JonesRetired | ManningRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Unofficial career sacks | 173.5 | — |
| Pro Bowls | 8 | 14 |
| First-team All-Pro selections | 5 | — |
| Defensive Player of the Year awards | 2 | — |
| Games played | 191 | — |
| MVP awards | — | 5 |
| Super Bowl titles | — | 2 |
| Passing yards | — | 71,940 |
| Touchdown passes | — | 539 |
| Super Bowl MVP | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 93 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 93 |
Peyton Manning leads with a GOAT score of 90.7 against 90.4 for Deacon Jones — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Jones scores higher on peak, dominance. Manning leads on honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Jones: 90.4, Manning: 90.7.
Make your case for Jones vs Manning. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.