Who is better, Jones or Hendricks?
Deacon Jones leads with a GOAT score of 90.4 against 90.2 for Ted Hendricks — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Deacon Jones above Ted Hendricks: 90.4 vs 90.2. Deacon Jones leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Ted Hendricks leads on Honours, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Jones wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Hendricks wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/deacon-jones-vs-ted-hendricks
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Jones leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Jones | 0 | 0 | 5 | 13 | 68 | 151 |
| 🇺🇸 Hendricks | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 308 | 658 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JonesRetired | HendricksRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Unofficial career sacks | 173.5 | — |
| Pro Bowls | 8 | 8 |
| First-team All-Pro selections | 5 | — |
| Defensive Player of the Year awards | 2 | — |
| Games played | 191 | — |
| Super Bowl titles | — | 4 |
| Blocked kicks | — | 25 |
| Career interceptions | — | 26 |
| Consecutive games played | — | 215 |
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 94 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Deacon Jones leads with a GOAT score of 90.4 against 90.2 for Ted Hendricks — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hendricks scores higher on honours, longevity. Jones leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Jones: 90.4, Hendricks: 90.2.
Make your case for Jones vs Hendricks. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.