GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Dottin vs Ismail

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
DottinWinner
88.0

Dottin wins: Peak, Honours

Ismail
88.0

Ismail wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/deandra-dottin-vs-shabnim-ismail

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏴 Deandra Dottin
88.0

Dottin leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Scored the first century in women's T20 internationals, from 38 balls.

1. Deandra Dottin
88.0
2. Shabnim Ismail
88.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🏴 Deandra Dottin5 years played · career day 1,826168 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇿🇦 Shabnim Ismail5 years played · career day 1,82588 runs
-47.6% vs Dottin at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🏴 Dottin002250132324
🇿🇦 Ismail0082288216

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricDottinActiveIsmailRetired
T20 World Cup titles1
Fastest T20I century at the time (balls)38
T20I runs2,600
T20I wickets6297
ODI runs2,500
ODI wickets191
Fastest recorded delivery (km/h)132.1
ODI matches127
Career best ODI bowling ranking1
Dominance w25%8486
Peak w20%9694
Longevity w20%8486
Honours w20%8682
Statistics w15%9294

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Dottin88.0
Ismail88.0
The people
Dottin
Ismail

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Dottin vs Ismail. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →