Who is better, Hockley or Trueman?
Fred Trueman leads with a GOAT score of 90.1 against 90.0 for Debbie Hockley — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Hockley vs Trueman
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Fred Trueman above Debbie Hockley: 90.1 vs 90.0. Fred Trueman leads on Dominance, Peak. Debbie Hockley leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
TruemanWinner
90.1Trueman wins: Dominance, Peak
Hockley
90.0Hockley wins: Longevity, Honours
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/debbie-hockley-vs-fred-trueman
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Fred Trueman
90.1
Trueman leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Fred Trueman
2. Debbie Hockley
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇳🇿 Debbie Hockley5 years played · career day 2,921208 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Fred Trueman5 years played · career day 2,92185 runs
-59.1% vs Hockley at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇿 Hockley | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 66 | 264 |
| 🇬🇧 Trueman | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 119 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Trueman90.1
Hockley90.0
FAQ
Where does Hockley beat Trueman?
Hockley scores higher on honours, longevity. Trueman leads on peak, dominance.
How is the Hockley vs Trueman score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hockley: 90.0, Trueman: 90.1.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Hockley vs Trueman. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.