Who is better, Babashoff or Henricks?
Deborah Babashoff leads with a GOAT score of 79.2 against 79.2 for Jon Henricks — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Deborah Babashoff and Jon Henricks level at 79.2. Deborah Babashoff leads on Longevity, Statistics. Jon Henricks leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Babashoff wins: Longevity, Statistics
Henricks wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/deborah-babashoff-vs-jon-henricks
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Babashoff leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Babashoff | 0 | 0 | 50 | 114 | 363 | 469 |
| 🇦🇺 Henricks | 0 | 0 | 66 | 146 | 420 | 556 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BabashoffRetired | HenricksRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Pan American gold medals | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| United States titles | 3 | — |
| National team years | 6 | — |
| Relay medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 2 |
| World records | — | 6 |
| Commonwealth Games golds | — | 3 |
| Australian titles | — | 8 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 80 |
Deborah Babashoff leads with a GOAT score of 79.2 against 79.2 for Jon Henricks — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Henricks scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Babashoff leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Babashoff: 79.2, Henricks: 79.2.
Make your case for Babashoff vs Henricks. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.