Who is better, Deco or MacMillan?
Deco leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.2 for Shannon MacMillan — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Deco and Shannon MacMillan level at 84.2. Deco leads on Dominance, Peak. Shannon MacMillan leads on Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Deco wins: Dominance, Peak
MacMillan wins: Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/deco-midfielder-vs-shannon-macmillan-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Deco leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇹 Deco | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 37 | 72 |
| 🇺🇸 MacMillan | 0 | 0 | 55 | 117 | 349 | 677 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DecoRetired | MacMillanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Champions League titles | 2 | — |
| UEFA Cup titles | 1 | — |
| La Liga titles | 2 | — |
| Primeira Liga titles | 3 | — |
| Portugal caps | 75 | — |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| United States caps | — | 176 |
| United States goals | — | 60 |
| US Player of the Year awards | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 84 |
Deco leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.2 for Shannon MacMillan — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
MacMillan scores higher on honours, statistics. Deco leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Deco: 84.2, MacMillan: 84.2.
Make your case for Deco vs MacMillan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.