Who is better, Savićević or Gren?
Dejan Savićević leads with a GOAT score of 85.0 against 85.0 for Gunnar Gren — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Savićević vs Gren
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Dejan Savićević and Gunnar Gren level at 85.0. Dejan Savićević leads on Honours, Peak. Gunnar Gren leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SavićevićWinner
85.0Savićević wins: Peak, Honours
Gren
85.0Gren wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to FootballShareable URL · /compare/dejan-savicevic-vs-gunnar-gren
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇲🇪 Dejan Savićević
85.0
Savićević leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Dejan Savićević
2. Gunnar Gren
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇲🇪 Dejan Savićević5 seasons played · career day 1,825297 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Gunnar Gren5 seasons played · career day 1,825272 goals
-8.4% vs Savićević at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇲🇪 Savićević | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 297 | 620 |
| 🇸🇪 Gren | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95 | 272 | 572 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Savićević85.0
Gren85.0
FAQ
Where does Gren beat Savićević?
Gren scores higher on longevity. Savićević leads on peak, honours.
How is the Savićević vs Gren score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Savićević: 85.0, Gren: 85.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Savićević vs Gren. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.