Who is better, Cousins or Lobo?
DeMarcus Cousins leads with a GOAT score of 81.1 against 81.1 for Rebecca Lobo — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores DeMarcus Cousins and Rebecca Lobo level at 81.1. DeMarcus Cousins leads on Dominance, Longevity, Statistics. Rebecca Lobo leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cousins wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
Lobo wins: Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/demarcus-cousins-vs-rebecca-lobo
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cousins leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Cousins | 0 | 0 | 14.1 | 32.2 | 96.1 | 191.5 |
| 🇺🇸 Lobo | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 64.6 | 107.5 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CousinsRetired | LoboRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NBA All-Star selections | 4 | — |
| All-NBA selections | 2 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | 2 | — |
| Career points per game | 19.6 | — |
| Career rebounds per game | 10.2 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| NCAA titles | — | 1 |
| National Player of the Year awards | — | 1 |
| WNBA seasons | — | 7 |
| Hall of Fame inductions | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
DeMarcus Cousins leads with a GOAT score of 81.1 against 81.1 for Rebecca Lobo — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Lobo scores higher on honours. Cousins leads on dominance, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cousins: 81.1, Lobo: 81.1.
Make your case for Cousins vs Lobo. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.