Who is better, Ware or Hannah?
John Hannah leads with a GOAT score of 89.4 against 89.3 for DeMarcus Ware — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks John Hannah above DeMarcus Ware: 89.4 vs 89.3. John Hannah leads on Longevity, Dominance. DeMarcus Ware leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hannah wins: Dominance, Longevity
Ware wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/demarcus-ware-vs-john-hannah
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hannah leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Ware | 0 | 0 | 8 | 19.5 | 64.5 | 117 |
| 🇺🇸 Hannah | 0 | 0 | 55 | 116 | 335 | 697 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
John Hannah leads with a GOAT score of 89.4 against 89.3 for DeMarcus Ware — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ware scores higher on statistics. Hannah leads on dominance, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ware: 89.3, Hannah: 89.4.
Make your case for Ware vs Hannah. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.