Who is better, Lillee or Rizwan?
Mohammad Rizwan leads with a GOAT score of 85.1 against 85.0 for Dennis Lillee — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Lillee vs Rizwan
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Mohammad Rizwan above Dennis Lillee: 85.1 vs 85.0. Mohammad Rizwan leads on Statistics, Peak. Dennis Lillee leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
RizwanWinner
85.1Rizwan wins: Peak, Statistics
Lillee
85.0Lillee wins: Dominance, Honours
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/dennis-lillee-vs-mohammad-rizwan
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇵🇰 Mohammad Rizwan
85.1
Rizwan leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Mohammad Rizwan
2. Dennis Lillee
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇵🇰 Mohammad Rizwan5 years played · career day 1,825178 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Dennis Lillee5 years played · career day 2,555105 runs
-41.0% vs Rizwan at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Lillee | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 59 | 171 |
| 🇵🇰 Rizwan | 0 | 0 | 22 | 50 | 178 | 416 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Rizwan85.1
Lillee85.0
FAQ
Where does Lillee beat Rizwan?
Lillee scores higher on dominance, honours. Rizwan leads on peak, statistics.
How is the Lillee vs Rizwan score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Lillee: 85.0, Rizwan: 85.1.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Lillee vs Rizwan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.