Who is better, Rodman or Wilkens?
Dennis Rodman leads with a GOAT score of 81.5 against 81.5 for Lenny Wilkens — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Dennis Rodman and Lenny Wilkens level at 81.5. Dennis Rodman leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Lenny Wilkens leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Rodman wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Wilkens wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/dennis-rodman-vs-lenny-wilkens
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Rodman leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Rodman | 0 | 0 | 6.5 | 15.2 | 46.8 | 117.9 |
| 🇺🇸 Wilkens | 0 | 0 | 11.7 | 23 | 51.2 | 145.8 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RodmanRetired | WilkensRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NBA titles | 5 | — |
| Rebounding titles | 7 | — |
| Defensive Player of the Year awards | 2 | — |
| All-Defensive first teams | 7 | — |
| Career rebounds per game | 13.1 | — |
| All-Star selections | — | 9 |
| NBA titles as coach | — | 1 |
| Career assists | — | 7,211 |
| Points per game | — | 16.5 |
| Coaching wins | — | 1,332 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Dennis Rodman leads with a GOAT score of 81.5 against 81.5 for Lenny Wilkens — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Wilkens scores higher on statistics, longevity. Rodman leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Rodman: 81.5, Wilkens: 81.5.
Make your case for Rodman vs Wilkens. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.