Who is better, Wilder or Choynski?
Deontay Wilder leads with a GOAT score of 83.7 against 83.7 for Joe Choynski — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Wilder vs Choynski
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Deontay Wilder and Joe Choynski level at 83.7. Deontay Wilder leads on Honours. Joe Choynski leads on Peak, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WilderWinner
83.7Wilder wins: Honours
Choynski
83.7Choynski wins: Peak, Longevity
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/deontay-wilder-vs-joe-choynski
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Deontay Wilder
83.7
Wilder leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Deontay Wilder
2. Joe Choynski
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Joe Choynski5 years played · career day 1,826289 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Deontay Wilder5 years played · career day 1,82626 title wins
-91.0% vs Choynski at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Wilder | 0 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 22 | 36 |
| 🇺🇸 Choynski | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 218 | 635 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Wilder83.7
Choynski83.7
FAQ
Where does Choynski beat Wilder?
Choynski scores higher on peak, longevity. Wilder leads on honours.
How is the Wilder vs Choynski score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Wilder: 83.7, Choynski: 83.7.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Wilder vs Choynski. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.