Who is better, Brooks or Blanda?
George Blanda leads with a GOAT score of 89.1 against 89.0 for Derrick Brooks — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks George Blanda above Derrick Brooks: 89.1 vs 89.0. George Blanda leads on Longevity, Statistics. Derrick Brooks leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Blanda wins: Longevity, Statistics
Brooks wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/derrick-brooks-vs-george-blanda
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Blanda leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Brooks | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 317 | 679 |
| 🇺🇸 Blanda | 0 | 0 | 35 | 74 | 215 | 458 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BrooksRetired | BlandaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Pro Bowls | 11 | — |
| Defensive Player of the Year awards | 1 | — |
| Super Bowl titles | 1 | — |
| Interceptions | 25 | — |
| Consecutive starts | 208 | — |
| Seasons played | — | 26 |
| Career points | — | 2,002 |
| Passing touchdowns | — | 236 |
| AFL titles | — | 2 |
| AFL MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 99 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 94 |
George Blanda leads with a GOAT score of 89.1 against 89.0 for Derrick Brooks — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Brooks scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Blanda leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Brooks: 89.0, Blanda: 89.1.
Make your case for Brooks vs Blanda. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.