Who is better, device or Ame?
device leads with a GOAT score of 87.4 against 87.3 for Wang "Ame" Chunyu — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks device above Wang "Ame" Chunyu: 87.4 vs 87.3. device leads on Honours. Wang "Ame" Chunyu leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →device wins: Honours
Ame wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/device-esports-vs-es-ame
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
device leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇰 device | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 21 | 43 |
| 🇨🇳 Ame | 0 | 0 | 55 | 124 | 302 | 748 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | deviceActive | AmeActive |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 4 | — |
| Big events won | 30 | — |
| HLTV top-20 placements | 9 | — |
| HLTV No. 1 rankings | 1 | — |
| Career prize money (USD m) | 2 | — |
| The International finals | — | 2 |
| Major titles | — | 3 |
| The International top-four finishes | — | 3 |
| Seasons played | — | 9 |
| Career prize money in millions | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 92 |
device leads with a GOAT score of 87.4 against 87.3 for Wang "Ame" Chunyu — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ame scores higher on statistics. device leads on honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. device: 87.4, Ame: 87.3.
Make your case for device vs Ame. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.