Who is better, dev1ce or EliGE?
Jonathan "EliGE" Jablonowski leads with a GOAT score of 90.9 against 90.2 for Nicolai "dev1ce" Reedtz — a gap of 0.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jonathan "EliGE" Jablonowski above Nicolai "dev1ce" Reedtz: 90.9 vs 90.2. Jonathan "EliGE" Jablonowski leads on Statistics, Peak, Longevity. Nicolai "dev1ce" Reedtz leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →EliGE wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
dev1ce wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/device-vs-es-elige
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
EliGE leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for EliGE — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | dev1ceActive · Astralis | EliGEActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 4 | — |
| Intel Grand Slams | 1 | — |
| HLTV top-20 appearances | 9 | — |
| Career rating 2.0 | 1.15 | — |
| Big event MVPs | 13 | — |
| Career prize money (M$) | 2 | — |
| Majors won | — | 1 |
| Intel Grand Slam titles | — | 1 |
| Big tournament titles | — | 24 |
| HLTV top-20 placements | — | 6 |
| Seasons played | — | 13 |
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 94 |
Jonathan "EliGE" Jablonowski leads with a GOAT score of 90.9 against 90.2 for Nicolai "dev1ce" Reedtz — a gap of 0.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
dev1ce scores higher on dominance, honours. EliGE leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. dev1ce: 90.2, EliGE: 90.9.
Make your case for dev1ce vs EliGE. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.