Who is better, Taurasi or Smith?
Diana Taurasi leads with a GOAT score of 94.2 against 17.2 for Jalen Smith — a gap of 77.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Taurasi vs Smith
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Diana Taurasi above Jalen Smith: 94.2 vs 17.2. Diana Taurasi leads on Longevity, Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
TaurasiWinner
94.2Taurasi wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Smith
17.2Smith wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to BasketballShareable URL · /compare/diana-taurasi-vs-ros-jalen-smith
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Diana Taurasi
94.2
Taurasi leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Smith — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
1. Diana Taurasi
2. Jalen Smith
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Through age 22 · Form index per season
1. 🇺🇸 Diana Taurasi17 points per game
1 season by age 22 · 17 per season
Setting the pace at age 22
No verified birth date for Smith — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 22, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Taurasi94.2
Smith17.2
FAQ
Where does Smith beat Taurasi?
Smith does not lead any of the five categories; Taurasi is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Taurasi vs Smith score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Taurasi: 94.2, Smith: 17.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Taurasi vs Smith. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.