Who is better, Taurasi or Hatchell?
Diana Taurasi leads with a GOAT score of 94.2 against 88.0 for Sylvia Hatchell — a gap of 6.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Diana Taurasi above Sylvia Hatchell: 94.2 vs 88.0. Diana Taurasi leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Taurasi wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Hatchell wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/diana-taurasi-vs-sylvia-hatchell
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Taurasi leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Hatchell — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 22
No verified birth date for Hatchell — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 22, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | TaurasiRetired | HatchellRetired |
|---|---|---|
| WNBA points | 10,646 | — |
| WNBA titles | 3 | — |
| Olympic golds | 6 | — |
| All-Star selections | 11 | — |
| Finals MVP | 1 | — |
| Seasons played | 20 | — |
| College coaching wins | — | 1,023 |
| NCAA championships | — | 1 |
| National titles across divisions | — | 3 |
| ACC titles | — | 6 |
| Seasons as a head coach | — | 44 |
| Dominance w25% | 94 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 93 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 96 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 90 |
Diana Taurasi leads with a GOAT score of 94.2 against 88.0 for Sylvia Hatchell — a gap of 6.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hatchell does not lead any of the five categories; Taurasi is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Taurasi: 94.2, Hatchell: 88.0.
Make your case for Taurasi vs Hatchell. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.