Who is better, Irvin or H. Sedin?
Dick Irvin leads with a GOAT score of 82.5 against 82.4 for Henrik Sedin — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Irvin vs H. Sedin
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Dick Irvin above Henrik Sedin: 82.5 vs 82.4. Dick Irvin leads on Peak, Honours, Dominance. Henrik Sedin leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
IrvinWinner
82.5Irvin wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
H. Sedin
82.4H. Sedin wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/dick-irvin-vs-henrik-sedin
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Dick Irvin
82.5
Irvin leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Dick Irvin
2. Henrik Sedin
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇨🇦 Dick Irvin5 seasons played · career day 1,826351 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Henrik Sedin5 seasons played · career day 2,921205 points
-41.6% vs Irvin at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Irvin | 0 | 0 | 55 | 118 | 266 | 691 |
| 🇸🇪 H. Sedin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 286 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Irvin82.5
H. Sedin82.4
FAQ
Where does H. Sedin beat Irvin?
H. Sedin scores higher on longevity. Irvin leads on peak, dominance, honours.
How is the Irvin vs H. Sedin score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Irvin: 82.5, H. Sedin: 82.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Irvin vs H. Sedin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.